Sean R. Bundy v. United States of America

14-7588Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7588
SEAN R. BUNDY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01374-WDQ)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Rondell Bundy, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Joseph Enright
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sean R. Bundy appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See
Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir. 2013)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.