The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7613•United States of America v. Michael J. Pavlock
14-7613Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7613
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL J. PAVLOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:10-cr-00007-IMK-RWT-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Pavlock, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew R. Cogar, Shawn
Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Clarksburg,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Pavlock appeals the district court’s orders
denying his third motion for an extension of time to respond to
the Government’s motion for a final order of forfeiture, and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Pavlock, No.
1:10-cr-00007-IMK-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 10, 2014; Sept. 15,
2014; Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.