The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7622•Kareem Jamal Currence v. E.K. CAULEY, Warden
14-7622Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7622
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
E.K. CAULEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00088)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s
orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in
forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv-
00088 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.