The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7827•James Lester Roudabush, Jr. v. Sgt. F. Mensah
14-7827Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 19, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7827
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. F. MENSAH; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff; STEARNS, Chief;
F. MILANO, Captain; G. HUNTER; C. M. KYLTON, USDJ;
MS. ERVIN, Classification Supv.; GRAHAM, Classification
Counselor; HYLTON, Director, U.S. Marshal Service;
J. COREY, FPDO; A. ANDERSON, SAUSA; K. PEDERSEN, AUSA;
LT. REA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00646-RBS-LRL)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his post-judgment motion to reopen
proceedings in his civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Sgt. F.
Mensah, No. 2:13-cv-00646-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.