The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1064•Kenneth Bevins; Victoria Bevins v. Apogee Coal Company, LLC
15-1064Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 3, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1064
KENNETH BEVINS; VICTORIA BEVINS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
APOGEE COAL COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-24264)
Submitted: February 22, 2016 Decided: March 3, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cynthia M. Ranson, J. Michael Ranson, RANSON LAW OFFICES, PLLC,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellants. William J. Hanna,
Eric T. Frye, Keith R. Hoover, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH BONASSO
PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Bevins and Victoria Bevins appeal the district
court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Apogee Coal
Company in the Bevins’ action under W. Va. Code Ann. § 23-4-2
(LexisNexis 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bevins v. Apogee Coal Co., No. 2:13-cv-
24264 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.