The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1949•Amy Gosnell; Ann Bowman v. Catawba County
15-1949Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1949
AMY GOSNELL; ANN BOWMAN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
CATAWBA COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; COY REID;
DAVID LAIL; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00179-RLV-DCK)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy Pulliam Quinn, THE QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellants. Patrick H. Flanagan, Virginia M.
Wooten, CRANFILL SUMNER & HARTZOG LLP, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Amy Gosnell and Ann Bowman appeal the district court’s
judgment granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss their gender
discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (2012); age discrimination claims, brought pursuant to
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29
U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012); and state law claims for tortious
interference with contract, defamation, and punitive damages.
We have considered the parties’ arguments and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Gosnell v. Catawba Cnty., No. 5:14-cv-00179-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C.
July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.