The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1952•Alexei Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials
15-1952Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 5, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1952
ALEXEI BYKHOVSKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEUROCOG TRIALS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00378-BO)
Submitted: March 31, 2016 Decided: April 5, 2016
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexei Bykhovski, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Sheehan,
BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Nashville, Tennessee; Scott
Burnett Smith, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Huntsville,
Alabama, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexei Bykhovski appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Bykhovski’s
complaint alleging that Defendant discriminated against him
based on his sex and age when making certain hiring decisions.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Bykhovski’s motions to supplement the
record and affirm the district court’s judgment. Bykhovski v.
NeuroCog Trials, No. 5:14-cv-00378-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.