The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1980•Kirk Chappell v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local Union 772
15-1980Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 19, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1980
KIRK CHAPPELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local
Union 772,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SCOTT FULMER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(3:14-cv-02153-MGL)
Submitted: March 22, 2016 Decided: April 19, 2016
Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirk Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas Robert Jason Aubrey,
Victoria Louise Bor, SHERMAN DUNN COHEN LEIFER & YELLIG, PC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kirk Chappell appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Chappell’s claims
of negligence and breach of contract. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Chappell v. Int’l
Bhd. of Elec. Workers, No. 3:14-cv-02153-MGL (D.S.C. July 31,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.