The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2135•Balal Services Trust v. William Clifton Stacey, Sr.
15-2135Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 13, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2135
BALAL SERVICES TRUST,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM CLIFTON STACEY, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
FREIDA B. STACEY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: March 31, 2016 Decided: April 13, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
William Clifton Stacey, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Ira Klein,
Robert Gregory Tomchin, CRANFORD, SCHULTZE, TOMCHIN & ALLEN, PA,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
William Stacey, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
granting the Government’s motion for default judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Balal Servs. Tr. v.
Stacey, No. 1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2015); see
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55; 28 U.S.C. § 3304(b)(1)(A), (B) (2012); N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 39-23.4 (2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.