The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2279•Anthony Sahadeo v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Naval Acquisition Career Center
15-2279Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2279
ANTHONY SAHADEO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Naval Acquisition Career Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00473-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016
Before SHEDD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Sahadeo, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Sahadeo appeals the district court’s order granting
the Navy’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sahadeo’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Sahadeo has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.