The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2370•Katy J. Coello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
15-2370Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2370
KATY J. COELLO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
(Tax Ct. No. 001954-15 L)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katy J. Coello, Appellant Pro Se. Mark A. Bond, William J.
Wilkins, Elizabeth G. Chirich, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Washington, D.C.; Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Senior Attorney,
Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Caroline D. Ciraolo,
Douglas Campbell Rennie, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Katy J. Coello appeals the tax court’s order dismissing
her petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the tax court. Coello v. Comm’r, Tax Ct.
No. 001954-15 L (U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 21, 2015). We grant Coello’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis and we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.