Dennis R. Siple; Marion C. Siple v. First Franklin Financial Corp., as originating lender

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2446
DENNIS R. SIPLE; MARION C. SIPLE,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP., as originating lender and
note holder; U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor
trustee to Bank of America, N.A., as an assignee of the
Deed of Trust; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, as second assignee
of Deed of Trust as Trustee for the Merrill Lynch - First
Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset Backed
Certificates Series 2007-4, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as
a loan servicer; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC., a/k/a MERS and nominee of Bank of America; JUAN SOTO,
as agent for MERS; WENDY SEVIER, agent for Bank of America,
N.A.; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, as a loan servicer; MARK D.
MEYER, as trustee; JOHN A. ANSELL, III, as trustee; KENNETH
SAVITZ, as trustee; DIANE S. ROSENBERG, as trustee;
EQUIFAX; TRANSUNION; EXPERIAN, Jointly and severally as
credit reporting agencies, inclusively; DOES 1-20, as
parties yet unknown,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02841-RDB)
Submitted: April 29, 2016 Decided: June 2, 2016
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis R. Siple, Marion C. Siple, Appellants Pro Se. Craig
Robert Haughton, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Mark David
Meyer, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Nathan
Daniel Adler, NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, PA,
Baltimore, Maryland; Robert J. Schuckit, SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES
PC, Zionsville, Indiana; Sandy David Baron, SHULMAN, ROGERS,
GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, PA, Potomac, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Dennis R. Siple and Marion C. Siple appeal the district
court’s orders dismissing their civil action regarding the
foreclosure of the Siples’ property and denying their Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Siple v. First
Franklin Fin. Corp., No. 1:14-cv-02841-RDB (D. Md. May 15, 2015;
Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --