The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2476•William Scott Davis, Ii v. James A. Hunt
15-2476Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2476
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES A. HUNT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00035-D)
Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions to reopen and to amend the judgment
in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt,
No. 5:11-cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2015; Nov. 23, 2015). We
deny Davis’ motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.