The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-2556•Bruce B. Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.
15-2556Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2556
BRUCE B. THOMAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(3:15-cv-01604-RBH)
Submitted: April 26, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce B. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. James J. Hinchey, Jr.,
HINCHEY, MURRAY & PAGLIARINI, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce B. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to remand to state court and granting the Defendant’s
motion to dismiss this action seeking the recovery of benefits
under insurance policies. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Ins.
Co., No. 3:15-cv-01604-RBH (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.