King Grant-Davis v. Shane Fortune

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2598
KING GRANT-DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT BLIEMEISTER; JEROME BURGESS; GREG LEY,
of Wal-Mart, Charleston, South Carolina District; WAL-MART,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-04211-PMD)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant-
Davis v. Fortune, No. 2:15-cv-04211-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2015).
We decline to consider the arguments Grant-Davis raises for the
first time on appeal. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250
(4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --