United States of America v. Teresa Lyn Fletcher

15-4699Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2016

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4699
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERESA LYN FLETCHER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:14-cr-00120-H-1)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Teresa Lyn Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III,
Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Teresa Lyn Fletcher appeals the district court’s order
denying Fletcher’s self-styled “Motion for Judicial Review of
Forfeiture Order,” which Fletcher filed pro se in her criminal
case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Fletcher, No. 5:14-cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.