The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-6112•Clinton D. Cox v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden
15-6112Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6112
CLINTON D. COX,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00021-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015
Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton D. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin
K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dismissed by Supreme Court, June 22, 2015
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clinton D. Cox, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cox v. O’Brien, No. 3:14-cv-00021-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va.
Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.