The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7474•United States of America v. Mike Andrew Brockett
15-7474Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7474
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MIKE ANDREW BROCKETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:92-cr-00088-4)
Submitted: March 31, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016
Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike Andrew Brockett, Appellant Pro Se. Alyssa Kate Nichol,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mike Andrew Brockett appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Brockett, No. 2:92-cr-00088-4 (E.D. Va.
July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.