The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7509•Patrick Parker, a/k/a Mustafa Muhjahid v. DR. PETER OBER, Physician; DR. KING, Physician; LEONARD LEVIN; MICHELLE ROSSMAN, MD
15-7509Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 17, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7509
PATRICK PARKER, a/k/a Mustafa Muhjahid,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. PETER OBER, Physician; DR. KING, Physician; LEONARD
LEVIN; MICHELLE ROSSMAN, MD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00490-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: March 25, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Elizabeth Martin
Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia;
John E. Peterson, Jr., HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen
Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Parker appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment or to dismiss for
failure to state a claim Parker’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action
alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
Parker v. Ober, No. 2:13-cv-00490-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Aug.
25, 2015 & entered Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.