The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7586•United States of America v. Angela Muse
15-7586Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7586
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANGELA MUSE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:03-cr-00554-JFM-1)
Submitted: February 29, 2016 Decided: March 17, 2016
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela Muse, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant
United States Attorney, Matthew Paul Phelps, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Angela Muse appeals the district court’s order affirming
the memorandum opinion and order of the magistrate judge and
overruling Muse’s objection to the writ of continuing
garnishment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Muse, No. 1:03-cr-00554-JFM-1
(D. Md. July 16 & Sept. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.