The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7663•United States of America v. Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum
15-7663Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 6, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7663
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FURMAN BENJAMIN QUATTLEBAUM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:02-cr-00548-CMC-17)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: April 6, 2016
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, John
C. Potterfield, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, Carrie Fisher Sherard,
Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. See United States v. Quattlebaum, No. 3:02-cr-00548-
CMC-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2015; filed Sept. 30, 2015, entered
Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.