The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7729•Robert L. Hedrick v. United States Marshal’s Service
15-7729Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7729
ROBERT L. HEDRICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL’S SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00532-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Hedrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert L. Hedrick appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we deny Hedrick’s motion for transcript at government
expense and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hedrick v. U.S. Marshal’s Serv., No. 1:15-cv-
00532-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.