The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7731•Anton Johnson v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden
15-7731Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7731
ANTON JOHNSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02250-BO)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anton Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anton Johnson, a District of Columbia Code offender civilly
committed under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act,
18 U.S.C. § 4248 (2012), appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v.
Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02250-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 19, 2015;
entered Oct. 20, 2015). Johnson’s motion for appointment of
counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.