The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7757•United States of America v. Michael Gerod Westbrook
15-7757Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7757
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL GEROD WESTBROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cr-00714-CMC-2)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Gerod Westbrook, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, James Hunter May, John
C. Potterfield, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Gerod Westbrook appeals from the district court’s
order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an
unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and
dismissing it on that basis. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Westbrook, No. 3:09-cr-
00714-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.