The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7789•Lionell Elijah Ephraim, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams v. KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden
15-7789Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7789
LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-04701)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Meredith George Thomas, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lionell Elijah Ephraim appeals the district court’s order
and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ephraim v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-04701 (S.D. W. Va. Oct.
27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.