The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7791•United States of America v. Samuel Paul Crook
15-7791Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7791
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-7793
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-
DSC-1)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Crook appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motions filed in his related criminal cases. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1;
3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2015). We deny
Crook’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.