The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7884•Joseph A. Daniels v. Paul E. Caldwell
15-7884Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7884
JOSEPH A. DANIELS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL E. CALDWELL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00856-REP-RCY)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph A. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion for Judgment” that the district court
construed as motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:14-cv-00856-REP-RCY (E.D. Va.
Nov. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.