The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7907•Antoinne Smith v. Sergeant E. Watkins
15-7907Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7907
ANTOINNE SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT E. WATKINS,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
ROBERT GREEN, Warden; MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-
cv-03893-PWG)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antoinne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lowell Frederick,
Edward B. Lattner, Jody Lynn Malmstrom, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antoinne Smith appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Sergeant
Watkins, No. 8:13-cv-03893-PWG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2015). We also
deny Smith’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.