The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7953•Minyard Cass Davis v. WILLIAM B. WATSON, Sheriff
15-7953Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7953
MINYARD CASS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM B. WATSON, Sheriff; TAYLOR, Deputy Sheriff; FAULK,
Deputy Sheriff; M. DAVIS, Deputy Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-00146-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Minyard Cass Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W.
Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss
and dismissing Davis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for
failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Davis v. Watson, No. 2:15-cv-
00146-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2015). We deny Davis’ motion
for oral argument via videoconference. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.