The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7977•Charles A. Brower v. Dr. James Smith
15-7977Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7977
CHARLES A. BROWER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. JAMES SMITH,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
ROY COOPER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03240-BO)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22,2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Brower, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown,
Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Brower appeals the district court’s order
granting Dr. James Smith’s summary judgment motion on Brower’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims, and he has filed a motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brower’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
See Brower v. Smith, No. 5:13-ct-03240-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.