The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-7988•Darryl L. Cook v. United States of America
15-7988Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7988
DARRYL L. COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (0:14-cv-02660-RMG)
Submitted: April 4, 2016 Decided: May 3, 2016
Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl L. Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl L. Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing this
action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v.
United States, No. 0:14-cv-02660-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.