The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-8021•United States of America v. Yulissa Eusebio
15-8021Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-8021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
YULISSA EUSEBIO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:12-cr-00001-MFU-2)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yulissa Eusebio, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Yulissa Eusebio appeals from the district court’s order
denying her motion for reconsideration of her 90-month sentence
and the order denying her motion for reconsideration of that
order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Eusebio, No. 5:12-cr-00001-
MFU-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 28 & Dec. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.