The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1046•Catherine Denise Randolph v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Identity Theft Task Force
16-1046Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1046
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Identity Theft Task
Force,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:16-cv-00036-WMN)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint for failing to state a claim. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. U.S. Dep’t of
Justice, No. 1:16-cv-00036-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.