The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1071•THOMAS WILSON BEAUMONT, III, House of Beaumont, Beneficiary, Pre-1861 private… v. South State Bank; Unknown Trustees 1-10
16-1071Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1071
THOMAS WILSON BEAUMONT, III, House of Beaumont,
Beneficiary, Pre-1861 private American Citizen of the
United States of America, the de jure Republic,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH STATE BANK; UNKNOWN TRUSTEES 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (9:15-mc-00385-CWH-MGB)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Wilson Beaumont, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Wilson Beaumont, III, appeals the district court’s
January 11, 2016, order dismissing as moot his self-styled
revised bill in equity and petition for a temporary restraining
order and denying his self-styled petition to seal and proceed
ex parte. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Beaumont v. S. State Bank, No. 9:15-mc-00385-
CWH-MGB (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2016) We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.