The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1236•Sharon Dye v. U.s. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo, N.a.
16-1236Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1236
SHARON DYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; WELLS FARGO, N.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00082-RJC)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sharon Dye, Appellant Pro Se. John T. Benjamin, Jr., LAW OFFICE
OF JOHN T. BENJAMIN, JR., PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her civil action challenging the validity of a note underlying a
state foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Dye v. U.S. Bank Nat’l
Ass’n, No. 3:15-cv-00082-RJC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.