The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1255•Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr. v. Wilmington North Carolina Police Department
16-1255Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1255
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF RALPH
EVANGELOUS, Wilmington North Carolina Police Department; WANDA
COPLEY, County Attorney; BENJAMIN DAVID, District County Office;
UNKNOWN, Wilmington North Carolina Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00036-BO)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v.
Wilmington N.C. Police Dep’t, No. 7:09-cv-00036-BO (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.