Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr. v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

16-1267Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2016

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1267
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:97-cv-01969-WDQ)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael N.
Russo, Jr., COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Aikens v.
Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard).
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm. Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel
is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.