The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1525•William Scott Davis, Jr. v. Attorney Richard Durham
16-1525Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1525
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY RICHARD DURHAM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00036-H)
Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying six motions in his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Davis v. Durham, No. 5:11−cv−00036−H (E.D.N.C.
Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.