The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2137•In re: Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar
16-2137Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2137
In re: MOHAMMAD ASHRAF MOHAMMAD-OMAR,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3; 1:10-cv-01112-CMH)
Submitted: March 9, 2017 Decided: March 27, 2017
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, motion to correct clerical
errors, and motion for judgment on the pleadings, following the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court
denied these three motions by order dated February 24, 2017.
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided
Mohammad-Omar’s pending motions, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.