The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2167•Janice Robinson v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Raymond Mabus, Secretary
16-2167Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 26, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2167
JANICE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Raymond Mabus, Secretary,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00004-H)
Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 26, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.*
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janice Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Roberto Francisco Ramirez, Assistant United States
Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d)
(2012).
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Janice Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment
discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Dep’t of
the Navy, No. 7:15-cv-00004-H (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 31, 2016 & entered Sept. 1, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.