The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2278•Marlow L. Bates, Sr. v. Apple, Inc.
16-2278Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2278
MARLOW L. BATES, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00929-JFM)
Submitted: March 28, 2017 Decided: March 31, 2017
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlow L. Bates, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Will C. Autz, New York, New York, David R.
Eberhart, San Francisco, California, Rachel S. Janger, O’MELVENY & MYERS, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marlow L. Bates, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his copyright
infringement suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Bates v. Apple, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00929-JFM (D. Md.
Oct. 13, 2016). We deny Bates’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.