The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6000•Christopher S. Francis v. Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (dpscs)
16-6000Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6000
CHRISTOPHER S. FRANCIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL
SERVICES (DPSCS),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-01255-GJH)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Scott Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery
Meloy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher S. Francis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Francis v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs.,
No. 8:15-cv-01255-GJH (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.