The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6001•David Earl Jones v. Paul G. Butler, Jr.; Willis J. Fowler; Anthony E. Rand; Derrick Wadsworth
16-6001Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6001
DAVID EARL JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANTHONY E. RAND;
DERRICK WADSWORTH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BEVERLY PERDUE; PATRICK L. MCCRORY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03142-D)
Submitted: May 25, 2016 Decided: June 14, 2016
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special
Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Earl Jones appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones
v. Butler, No. 5:14-ct-03142-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015). We
deny as unnecessary Jones’ motion for a certificate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.