The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6014•United States of America v. Courtney Omar Boyd, a/k/a Omar
16-6014Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
COURTNEY OMAR BOYD, a/k/a Omar,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Omar Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Courtney Omar Boyd appeals from the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his
sentence. Our review of the record reveals that the district
court did not err in denying Boyd’s motion. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Boyd, No.
4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.