The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6015•United States of America v. Roberto Lopez-Gomez
16-6015Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERTO LOPEZ-GOMEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cr-00234-FL-1)
Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roberto Lopez-Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roberto Lopez-Gomez appeals the district court’s margin
order denying his motion for sentence modification. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Once imposed,
a sentence is final and may be modified only under a narrow set
of well-defined circumstances. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012);
United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235 (4th Cir. 2010).
Lopez-Gomez has failed to establish that any of these
circumstances is applicable to his case. Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.