United States of America v. Booker T. Vanderhorst

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BOOKER T. VANDERHORST,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cr-00294-PMD-1; 2:15-cv-01979-PMD)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Booker T. Vanderhorst, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan S. Williams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Booker T. Vanderhorst seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion to amend the record in his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2012) proceeding. We dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction because the order Vanderhorst seeks to appeal is
neither final nor otherwise appealable. See Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949); Catlin v. United
States, 324 U.S. 229, 233-34 (1945).
Accordingly, we deny Vanderhorst’s motion asking this court
to amend the record and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --