The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6042•United States of America v. Steve Dias, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie
16-6042Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Katherine
Lee Martin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steve Dias appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Diaz, No. 3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 18, 2015); see United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05
(4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion
for abuse of discretion). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.