The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6046•Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr. v. Eva Sharp
16-6046Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6046
ARNOLD EUGENE FOX, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EVA SHARP; CHRYSTAL MCCORMICK; JOHN MCCORMICK; OTHER UNNAMED
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00270-MR-DLH)
Submitted: June 22, 2016 Decided: July 1, 2016
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Fox v. Sharp, No. 1:15-cv-00270-MR-DLH
(W.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.