The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6101•Nathan E. Jacobs v. MR. BERRIOS, Unit Manager; MR. VIALAPANDA, Unit Manager; MR. WHALEN, Case Manager
16-6101Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6101
NATHAN E. JACOBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. BERRIOS, Unit Manager; MR. VIALAPANDA, Unit Manager; MR.
WHALEN, Case Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (0:15-cv-02514-SB)
Submitted: June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan E. Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathan E. Jacobs appeals the district court’s order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil
action without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Jacobs’ informal brief does not challenge the district
court’s dispositive reasoning, Jacobs has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.