The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6115•United States of America v. Miguel Bracamontes, a/k/a Miguel Rayo Bracamontes, a/k/a Miguel Bracamontes-Rayo,…
16-6115Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 13, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6115
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MIGUEL BRACAMONTES, a/k/a Miguel Rayo Bracamontes, a/k/a
Miguel Bracamontes-Rayo, a/k/a Reinaldo Palomares,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:10-cr-00030-F-1)
Submitted: May 2, 2016 Decided: May 13, 2016
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Miguel Bracamontes, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Miguel Bracamontes appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Bracamontes, No. 7:10-cr-
00030-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.